TODAY, NEW YORK TIMES STOCK IS CHEAPER THAN EVER

wall-street.jpg

This is another example of how these “insightful” Wall Street financial analysts see the newspaper industry and the “solutions.”

“Shares of The New York Times Company (NYT) are off as much as 2.5% today to a 52-week low on another analyst downgrade.

Merrill Lynch cut the shares to “sell” from “neutral.”

The firm also put a “sell” rating on McClatchy (MNI) and Lee Enterprises (LEE), two other newspaper stocks.

The research call is late, very late.

It has been evident for almost two years that falling print advertising was destorying the financial future of newspapers.

Most have onlne editions, but they often produce little more than a few percent of overall revenue at major chains

The question now is where the newspaper industry will turn.

It could begin to cut circulation in a bid to save paper and distribution costs.

It takes the risk that the readers will not move to the online version of the paper to get their news.

The other option is to begin to sharply cut the salaries of newspaper employees.

Most papers have unions, but the reality of the crisis is not lost on them.

Lower salaries would save some jobs.

For now.

Douglas A. McIntyre

 

 

Well, The New York Times Company stock is cheaper than ever today.

And it doesn’t matter how bad these analysts are, the reality is that the newspaper industry needs to react.

Not with another P.R. campaign but with more agressive changes and innovations.

We need:

Better newspapers.

Better journalists.

Better managers.

And The New York Times Company needs, for sure, better management.

As soon as possible.



A NEWSPAPER MANAGING EDITOR LEAVES AND SAYS…

01.jpg

Anne Gordon, departing managing editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer, says in a recent interview that changes in the newspaper industry are more profound than any of us want to admit, and that papers are suffering the pain of their failure to innovate.

Oh, oh…

“I see print journalists playing an active role less in the breaking of news and more in the analytical side-explaining it.”

“I also believe this whole democratization of news, with a give and take between the provider and consumer, is not a trend but a reality of the next generation.”

“Change is coming from the outside and not from the inside. There’s too much resistance to change among newspaper people.”

“For several years I’ve been an advocate of newspapers withdrawing from the Associated Press. I don’t think it’s a worthwhile expenditure-roughly $1 million [for the Inquirer]. You’re giving your news to an agency that’s going to immediately resell it, and we’ve done tracking studies where, five hours later, any mention of the Inquirer having broken the story is completely gone.”

“When I became managing editor, there were 640 people in the editorial department. When I left, there were 330.”

This must be a world record on how to kill a newspaper.

Well, now she is gone, too…

She’s leaving the paper for a position with Dubilier & Co., a private equity and investment firm!

Picture: the “scary” newsroom of the Philadelphia Inquirer.