Files under General | Apr 18th


More common sense pilot reactions:

“KLM, acting on a European Union request, flew a Boeing 737-800 without passengers at the regular altitude of 10 km (6 miles) and up to the 13 km maximum on Saturday. Germany’s Lufthansa said it flew 10 empty planes to Frankfurt from Munich at altitudes of up to 8 km.

“We have not found anything unusual and no irregularities, which indicates the atmosphere is clean and safe to fly,” said a spokeswoman for KLM, which is part of Air France-KLM.

German airline Air Berlin said it had also carried out test flights and expressed irritation at the shutdown of European air space.

“We are amazed that the results of the test flights done by Lufthansa and Air Berlin have not had any bearing on the decision-making of the air safety authorities,” Chief Executive Joachim Hunold said.

“The closure of the air space happened purely because of the data of a computer simulation at the Vulcanic Ash Advisory Center in London,” he told the mass circulation Bild am Sonntag paper.”

Another pilot:

“NATS has been the ‘face’ to the media of the UK’s decision to close its airspace in the face of this unprecedented event. I would sugest that this has been been politically expedient for the higher echelons of govenment and, perhaps, the airlines (initially) to have NATS as the ‘fall’ guy as and when blame begins to be bandied around at a later date as will inevitable happen.

I am of the opinion that there has been massive over-kill in this matter and that tactical discretion to fly or not should have been made available to the operators.

It was always held that air traffic control provides a ‘service’. In my experience the ATC system has become more ‘executive’ than ‘advisory’ over the past 25 years but that is a topic for another debate. However, the service that NATS and the Met office should have provided was constantly updated information on the location and concentrations of the ash.

Of course, NATS states that it has reacted to ICAO procedures and this whole affair is reminiscent of the ‘liquids’ ban. It happened to the UK and the rest of the world has been forced to comply irrespective of the threat (or complete lack of it).

I would suggest that there should be a complete re-think/re-write of this ICAO procedure as and when the crisis is over. The economic consequences of this blanket, unthinking policy has been dire. Safety, of course, is paramount but I am positive that many air services could have been operated since Thursday with no risk to crew or passengers whatsoever.”

Remember, UK politicias are on election time so nobody wants to bre involved in this mess.

Specially Gordon Brown, the government and the Labour party.

More. later.

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply