<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE iPHONE NUMBERS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/index.php/2010/02/11/the-iphone-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/index.php/2010/02/11/the-iphone-numbers/</link>
	<description>BY JUAN ANTONIO GINER, PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER OF INNOVATION INTERNATIONAL MEDIA CONSULTING GROUP. LONDON.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: (Infographic) Who is Getting Rich Off The iPhone? - PSFK</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/index.php/2010/02/11/the-iphone-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-12807</link>
		<dc:creator>(Infographic) Who is Getting Rich Off The iPhone? - PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/?p=11828#comment-12807</guid>
		<description>[...] Innovations in Newspapers. Infographic by Column Five [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Innovations in Newspapers. Infographic by Column Five [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/index.php/2010/02/11/the-iphone-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-12806</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/?p=11828#comment-12806</guid>
		<description>I really like the picture,but it seems to be wrong.
Apple manufactures 1 iPhone. A customer has two options:
1: He buys the iPhone without a contract and pays a fee of 599$. Apple gets 599$ over and out!
2: He buys the iPhone with an At$t carrier contract and pays 199$ + a monthly payment of 30$ (24 x 30$ = 720$) = 919$.
So the figures on this picture are mixed up in the wrong way! The guy on the left hand side has to pay 599$, because he bought the iPhone without a contract. ... 
The blue subsudy or extra fee line is totally wrong! At&amp;t doesn&#039;t pay an extra fee or subsidy of 351$ to Apple. Apple sells the iPhone for 550$ (within this picture) to At&amp;t over and out!
So if a customer decides to take the At&amp;t option the customer has to pay 199$ up-front to At&amp;t + a monthly fee of 30$ (or whatever monthly plan he decided to take). The monthly payment from the customer to At&amp;t is totally missing.
You should draw the picture in a 2 level design.
Level 1: 
Left hand side a customer who pays 599$ for the iPhone.
In the middle you should place Apple. They earn 599$ for this sold iPhone and have to pay 179$ to their right hand side located manufacturers.
Level 2:
A cursor up to At&amp;t, which pay 351$ for an iPhone to Apple, which should be coloured in another way. Another customer should be drawn on top of the original customer on Level 1 (named the At&amp;t option). This customer pays 199$ to Apple (so Apple earns 351 from At&amp;t + 199 $ from the customer = 550$). But this customer has a contract with At$t. So you should link this customer to At&amp;t with his monthly payment of 30$ (or whatever plan he decides to take). 
This at&amp;t option does not affect the payment of 179$ from Apple to their manufacturers.
As someone who wants to buy an iPhone you have two options (with or without an At&amp;t contract), and your picture should obtain these two options. So just think about updating your pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the picture,but it seems to be wrong.<br />
Apple manufactures 1 iPhone. A customer has two options:<br />
1: He buys the iPhone without a contract and pays a fee of 599$. Apple gets 599$ over and out!<br />
2: He buys the iPhone with an At$t carrier contract and pays 199$ + a monthly payment of 30$ (24 x 30$ = 720$) = 919$.<br />
So the figures on this picture are mixed up in the wrong way! The guy on the left hand side has to pay 599$, because he bought the iPhone without a contract. &#8230;<br />
The blue subsudy or extra fee line is totally wrong! At&amp;t doesn&#8217;t pay an extra fee or subsidy of 351$ to Apple. Apple sells the iPhone for 550$ (within this picture) to At&amp;t over and out!<br />
So if a customer decides to take the At&amp;t option the customer has to pay 199$ up-front to At&amp;t + a monthly fee of 30$ (or whatever monthly plan he decided to take). The monthly payment from the customer to At&amp;t is totally missing.<br />
You should draw the picture in a 2 level design.<br />
Level 1:<br />
Left hand side a customer who pays 599$ for the iPhone.<br />
In the middle you should place Apple. They earn 599$ for this sold iPhone and have to pay 179$ to their right hand side located manufacturers.<br />
Level 2:<br />
A cursor up to At&amp;t, which pay 351$ for an iPhone to Apple, which should be coloured in another way. Another customer should be drawn on top of the original customer on Level 1 (named the At&amp;t option). This customer pays 199$ to Apple (so Apple earns 351 from At&amp;t + 199 $ from the customer = 550$). But this customer has a contract with At$t. So you should link this customer to At&amp;t with his monthly payment of 30$ (or whatever plan he decides to take).<br />
This at&amp;t option does not affect the payment of 179$ from Apple to their manufacturers.<br />
As someone who wants to buy an iPhone you have two options (with or without an At&amp;t contract), and your picture should obtain these two options. So just think about updating your pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended Links for February 11th &#124; Alex Gamela - Digital Media &#38; Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/index.php/2010/02/11/the-iphone-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-12802</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended Links for February 11th &#124; Alex Gamela - Digital Media &#38; Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/?p=11828#comment-12802</guid>
		<description>[...] THE iPHONE NUMBERS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THE iPHONE NUMBERS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

