DAVID REMNICK IS RIGHT

The editor of The New Yorker writes this week a very strong comment:

"In the wake of the Administration’s record of dishonesty and incompetence in Iraq and the consequent decline in the President’s domestic polling numbers, it is not hard to discern why the White House might find a convenient enemy in the editors of the Times: this is an election year.

The assault on the Times is a no-lose situation for the White House.

The banking story itself showed the Administration to be doing what it had declared it was doing from the start: concertedly monitoring the financial transactions of potential terrorists.

At the same time, by smearing the Times for the delectation of the Republican “base” the Administration could direct attention away from its failures, including, last week, the Supreme Court’s decision to block its plans to try Guantanamo detainees before military commissions."

I have the feeling that Mr. Remnick is right.